|
| |
OBJECTIVE SCORING SYSTEMS FOR RISK OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM
Wells Criteria
Geneva Criteria
(Geneva is more robust than Wells)
Wells' scoring system for PE
Criteria
|
Points
|
|
Suspected DVT |
3 |
|
Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE |
3 |
|
HR > 100 bpm |
1.5 |
|
Immobilisation/Surgery previous 4/52 |
1.5 |
|
Previous DVT/PE |
1.5 |
|
Haemoptysis |
1 |
|
Malignancy (active within 6 months) |
1 |
Risk
|
Points
|
% Patients with these features
|
Probability of PE (%)
|
|
Low |
0-2 |
40 |
3.6 |
|
Moderate |
3-6 |
53 |
20.5 |
|
High |
>6 |
7 |
66.7 |
Geneva scoring system for PE
Criteria
|
Points
|
|
Age 60-79 |
1 |
|
Age > 79 |
2 |
|
Previous DVT/PE |
1 |
|
Recent Immobilisation/Surgery previous |
3 |
|
HR > 100 bpm |
1 |
|
pCO2
< 36
36-39
|
2
1 |
|
pO2
< 49
49-60
60-71
61-82
|
4
3
2
1 |
|
CXR
Platelike atelectasis
Elevation of hemidiaphragm
|
1
1 |
Risk
|
Points
|
% Patients with these features
|
Probability of PE (%)
|
|
Low |
0-4 |
49 |
10 |
|
Moderate |
5-8 |
44 |
38 |
|
High |
9-12 |
6 |
81 |
|